Two Famous Philistines of Philosophy
Philosophy Now|April/May 2020
Christopher Devlin Brown sees similarities and differences in Nietzsche’s and Plato’s critiques of art.
Christopher Devlin Brown

Received wisdom says that the philosophical projects of Nietzsche and Plato are about as diametrically opposite as any two philosophical projects can be. This impression is not without justification. Plato is the

philosopher of otherworldly order who argued that our senses do not reveal any valuable or fundamental truths. Nietzsche is a selfproclaimed inverter of Platonic philosophy, denying and damning all that is eternal, perfect, and transcendent. However, an overlooked parallel between Nietzsche and Plato in their aesthetic ideas shows they have some unexpected common ground. Specifically, they both attack broad classes of art, arguing that such art is socially problematic. The problem for both of them is that art can negatively affect the development of higher types of people.

“But wait,” you might already be saying, “I can remember Plato’s anti-art attitude; but isn’t Nietzsche a proponent of art, even at times holding it above his often beloved science?”

This is somewhat true. Throughout his career Nietzsche promotes art as one of the most important human activities, and some of the people he most admires are artists. However, Nietzsche’s relationship with art is more complicated than a simple yea- or nay-saying. This is apparent from even a cursory glance at his writings criticizing the life and music of his former friend and hero, Richard Wagner. The later Nietzsche’s sustained attack on Wagner is part of a wider account of the nature and value of art which gives criteria for distinguishing valuable from valueless art. As with Plato’s aesthetic philosophy, these criteria are deeply related to broader moral and meta-physical concerns. Here I will determine what the points of similarity and difference are between how Nietzsche and Plato view art, explaining these similarities and differences in the context of their broader philosophies.

Nietzsche & Plato Against Art

The majority of Nietzsche’s argument I’ll use takes its most explicit form in aphorism 370 of The Gay Science. The same aphorism, with slight modifications, is also in his Nietzsche Contra Wagner. The argument is directed against Romantic and Christian art, and, in certain respects, it resembles some of Plato’s arguments against poetry in the Ion and The Republic.

Nietzsche argues that all art serves to alleviate the suffering caused either by an underabundance of life (I’ll call this ‘underabundant art/music’) or by an overabundance of life (‘overabundant art’ or ‘overabundant music’). Overabundant art is socially neutral or beneficial; but underabundant art often manifests in one of two negative ways. This form of art either destructively takes revenge on the world or makes underabundance into an ideal. Both of these effects hinder the production and flourishing of great humans, which is the ultimate goal Nietzsche promotes.

Plato’s arguments are diverse, but amount to the idea that art is pleasurable but misleading, and so dangerous. He sees the artist as something like a Pied Piper. For instance, in the Ion he argues that philosophers rather than poets should be the teachers of the Greeks, since poetic genius comes from divinely inspired madness rather than from knowledge, and the knowledgeable people should be the teachers. In other words, the inspired but ignorant poets should keep quiet and not try to teach anyone through their recitations. In The Republic he argues that poetry should not be allowed in the ideal society because it stimulates people to attempt to fill social roles for which they are not ideally suited, and this would result in social disharmony.

Nietzsche’s Argument

The most well-known and important ideas of the mature Nietzsche first see expression in The Gay Science. The first four Sections of this work were written during 1881-82 as an outgrowth of his previous work, The Dawn, and constitute more-or-less the first blossoming of ideas that Nietzsche would develop throughout the rest of his career, including the will to power, the death of God, eternal recurrence, the revaluation of all values, and the nature and value of human greatness. The last Section was written later, published in the Second Edition of 1887, and contains the thoughts of an even more mature Nietzsche.

The earlier Sections contain a series of aphorisms specifically on art (76-107), but aphorism 370 comes from the last Section, and as such comes from the mind of Nietzsche only a few years before his collapse into insanity, and well after his break from Wagner (and, perhaps tellingly, after Wagner’s death in 1883).

This is Nietzsche’s argument against Romantic or Christian art, based on 370 and a few other aphorisms:

1. All art is produced in the service of life, to alleviate some kind of suffering or illness.

2. Art-as-medicine can remedy either an overabundance of life, which must be discharged, or an underabundance of life, which must be supplemented.

3. Art that is a remedy for an underabundance of life often manifests itself as revenge on life: either as a vengeful destruction of the world which is the source of the artist’s suffering, or in the immortalization of the artist’s suffering as an ideal.

4. Consumption of either type of underabundant art has effects on the consumer, in particular preventing the flourishing of great spirits.

5. Great spirits are valuable; so if something prevents their flourishing then that thing should not be produced.

6. Therefore art that is made as a remedy for underabundance of life – which includes Wagnerian opera, Romantic pessimistic art and Christian art – should not be produced.

The first three premises are taken almost directly from 370. Here Nietzsche says:

Continue reading your story on the app

Continue reading your story in the magazine

MORE STORIES FROM PHILOSOPHY NOWView All

What Is Guilt?

Farah Abdessamad wonders if it is a function of responsibility.

5 mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

The Happy State

Dan Corjescu says soma could be coming.

4 mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

MINDING THE GAP

Dylan Skurka on a film that suggests it’s possible to choose to overcome your upbringing.

7 mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

What Is Happiness?

Gary Cox asks, ‘is happiness a cigar called Hamlet?’, and other searching questions.

10+ mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

The Philosopher with a Thousand Faces

Alex Gooch on narrative, meaning, and the failure of philosophy.

10+ mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

Samuel Grove

Samuel Grove recently published Retrieving Darwin’s Revolutionary Idea: The Reluctant Radical. In commemoration of the 150th Anniversary of The Descent of Man (1871), Roberto Navarrete sat down with him to discuss the philosophical dilemmas Darwin faced in applying his theory of natural selection to human beings.

10+ mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

Looking for the Purpose of Life

Brian King says that life’s meaning is a question of purpose; but what is the purpose of human existence?

10+ mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

Huygens A Scientist Among the Philosophers

Hugh Aldersey-Williams traces the philosophical connections of a polymath.

10 mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

Exploring Time

Nurana Rajabova looks for a way of seeing time as if from the outside.

7 mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022

Classics : A Vindication of the Rights of Woman

“Moralists have unanimously agreed, that unless virtue be nursed by liberty, it will never attain due strength and what they say of man I extend to mankind, insisting, that in all cases morals must be fixed on immutable principles; and that the being cannot be termed rational or virtuous, who obeys any authority but that of reason.” – Mary Wollstonecraft

8 mins read
Philosophy Now
December 2021 / January 2022
RELATED STORIES

KRISTINA WAGNER ON GH COMEBACK

late-breaking news

4 mins read
Soap Opera Digest
January 17, 2022

SPYKE AND MIKE

The past holiday season has been tough for Mike my BTR friends. Between covid and some unusual circumstances regarding his healing, his addiction has reappeared it’s ugly head.

4 mins read
Born To Ride Florida
February 2021

Two Meanings of “the Body Keeps the Score”

THE SOUL OF THERAPY KEVIN ANDERSON, PHD

5 mins read
Spirituality & Health
Sep/Oct 2020

NATALIE'S DEATH LEFT DAUGHTER A BASKET CASE!

Natasha Wood Wagner fell for motherly men!

1 min read
Globe
August 03, 2020

NATALIE DAUGHTER DOESN'T BELIEVE DEATH WAS ACCIDENT

Boat skipper insists Robert Wagner is hiding the truth

2 mins read
Globe
May 25, 2020

Southern Traditions

While many of us celebrate a plethora of life moments and holidays throughout the year, Wells Gallery out of South Carolina invites viewers to honor themes of tradition, “a custom passed down from generation to generation,” explains gallery director Emily Wagner. “We have cultural traditions and family traditions, and each contributes to a sense of practice and belonging.”

2 mins read
American Art Collector
April 2020

Lucky Charm

SINCE LAUNCHING ITS ONLY AMERICAN BREWERY, GUINNESS FINDS A SECOND HOME IN BALTIMORE.

10+ mins read
Baltimore magazine
April 2020

A Village School

Paganism is alive and well here in the Mari El Republic.

10+ mins read
Russian Life
March/April 2020

Night Watch

Lucerne lights up with activity when the day is done.

1 min read
Global Traveler
March 2020

Robert Wagner's Dirty Divorce Exposed!

NATALIE’S CLAIM OF CRUELTY FUELS SUSPICIONS - AND SHAKES HIS WIFE, JILL

2 mins read
National Enquirer
September 16, 2019