Determinism, in the most common philosophical sense of the term, is “the theory that everything that happens must happen as it does and could not have happened any other way” (Cambridge Online Dictionary, 2019). This means that everything that happens was bound to happen including human actions, and this implies that choice is some sort of illusion. If determinism is true, this shatters our fundamental understanding of ourselves and the universe, not to mention our moral practices. Nevertheless, the conclusion determinists themselves come to concerning its implications for moral responsibility are not always the same.
Morally speaking, determinists are mainly divided into two camps, namely compatibilists and incompatibilists. The incompatibilists argue that determinism completely negates the possibility of agent causation, and therefore moral responsibility. On the other hand, compatibilists claim that moral responsibility is still applicable under determinism. They are both contrasted to libertarians, who defend moral responsibility through believing in free will, dismissing determinism.
What’s interesting about the compatibilists’ position, is that they adhere to the idea that everything that happens is predetermined to happen, yet still argue for moral responsibility. One wonders, what is it that compatibilists are able to see that allows them to reconcile these two apparently contradictory theories?
This story is from the December 2020 / January 2021 edition of Philosophy Now.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the December 2020 / January 2021 edition of Philosophy Now.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
"Stand Out Of My Light"
Sophie Dibben watches Alexander the Great meet Diogenes the Cynic.
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
Hilarius Bogbinder looks at a man who wanted to make Peace from Warre.
The Philosophy of Work
Alessandro Colarossi has insights for the bored and understimulated.
Towards Love
George Mason on love as shared identity.
Hume's Problem of Induction
Patrick Brissey exposes a major unprovable assumption at the core of science.
A Philosophical History of Transhumanism
John Kennedy Philip goes deep into the search for (post-) human heights.
How to Have a Good Life
Meena Danishmal asks if Seneca's account of the good life is really practical.
Horseplay in Hibernia
Seán Moran explores equine escapades in Eire and elsewhere.
Philosophy & Hurling: Thinking & Playing
Stiofán Ó Murchadha knowing how we know.
Philip Pettit & The Birth of Ethics
Peter Stone thinks about a thought experiment about how ethics evolved.