Even her haters call her a “generational talent,” a disparagement candy-wrapped as a compliment, the implication being that the astonishing rise of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was somehow encoded in her DNA. Frame a thing as expected and it can be discounted. But rewind five years and it becomes clear just how unprecedented her rise has been. “Women like me aren’t supposed to run for office,” she said at the start of her journey to Washington. She was only stating facts. Months before AOC became the new face of the Democratic Party, she was working in a bar where she was expected to look “hot,” riding the 6 train, fretting about health insurance, and not really sure what she wanted to do with her life.
Her victory on June 26, 2018, over her mainstream Democratic opponent, Joe Crowley, was a marker delineating the moment after which American politics would never be the same. It established AOC’s prodigious political gifts while showcasing a new sort of Democratic candidate and a new way of recruiting them. Barack Obama, previous holder of the “generational talent” title, may have resembled Ocasio-Cortez in some ways. Brown-skinned, good looking, with his own misadventures in the postcollegiate wilderness, he challenged political convention even as he titillated its guardians. But he had a résumé—the first Black president of the Harvard Law Review, constitutional-law professor at the University of Chicago—that the Democratic-consultant class could easily recognize and safely admire. The Establishment didn’t know what to make of AOC. As she put it in an interview then, “If a spaceship landed in your backyard, it’s like, ‘What the fuck is that? Is it going to hurt me?’”
This story is from the February 14-27, 2022 edition of New York magazine.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the February 14-27, 2022 edition of New York magazine.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
Adelle Waldman Takes the Early Shift
In 2013, she published a novel that literary Brooklyn couldn’t stop talking about. It took a $12.25-an-hour job at a retail store to write the next one.
BIG FEELINGS
Its made her the most influential parenting expert since Dr. Spock.
THE SQUATTERS OF BEVERLY HILLS
AFTER A FUGITIVE DOCTOR ABANDONED HIS MANSION, AN ENTERPRISING GROUP OF PARTY THROWERS MANAGED TO SLIDE IN THROUGH THE FRONT DOOR, UPENDING THE COMFORTABLE LIVES OF THEIR NEW, ULTRAWEALTHY NEIGHBORS.
THE RIGHT ΤΟ CHANGE SEX
Trans kids are under attack. It’s time we found the courage to defend them.
Dynasties: Tanya Gold Fall of the House of Windsor The crisis behind the tabloid sensation surrounding Princess Catherine.
TO OUTSIDERS, the British royal family can seem like a curio.
192 MINUTES WITH ...Reesa Teesa
The \"Who TF Did I Marry\" TikToker, whose tale of a lying husband went megaviral, says she won't be fooled again.
Neighborhood News: Soldiers in the Subway
The governor sends in the troops.
The System: Zak Cheney-Rice
But His Crimes... Are voters forgetting the extraordinary accusations against Trump?
The Crying Game: Weeping on Cue is the Toughest Skill an Actor Can Learn. Could I Do It, Too?
Crying has been one of the most popular activities of the past four to eight years; the ability to do it on command has been considered the apex of acting ability for much longer. Consider the 2017 Decider investigation that revealed 96 percent of Best Actress winners over the past 50 years openly wept during their performances (compared with 60 percent of Best Actor winners, thanks to boring yet pervasive sociological dynamics that have long poisoned the human experience).
Performance Review: Allison P. Davis
Endless Love: J.Lo returns to her rom-com roots. Is she tired of repeating herself?