A new benchmark has been set by the Delhi High Court vacation benches. On June 23 for the third time during the ongoing summer vacations, benches comprising Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani and Justice Jasmeet Singh held virtual hearings simultaneously till 10:10 pm and 9:40 pm, respectively.
The Delhi High Court is currently on its annual summer vacation and only two judges are sitting to hear urgent matters. The cases are being heard through virtual mode due to the Co vid19 pandemic.
Justices SJ Kathawalla and SP Tava de of the Bombay High Court recently sat for over 12 hours from 10:45 am to 11:15 pm to hear urgent cases. In May 2018, Justice Kathawalla as a single judge sat till 3 am to finish over 120 matters without taking a break.
As per the circular notified by the Registrar General especially for the vacations, Division and Single Judge Benches of Justices Rekha Palli, Amit Bansal, Navin Chawla, Asha Menon, Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Jasmeet Singh, C Hari Shankar and Subramoni um Prasad have been hearing only urgent matters during the course of the vacation.
On June 23, both the judges began hearing of cases as part of the Division Bench. The Bench had heard over 20 matters listed before it after which Justice Bhambhani and Justice Singh again went for virtual court as single benches, hearing the vacation matters listed before them.
Continue reading your story on the app
Continue reading your story in the magazine
Are We Deaf To The Supreme Court?
IT is a matter of good tidings for supporters of democratic-republican governance all over the world to see the Indian Supreme Court in action under Justice NV Ramana.
Social Media: India's New Epidemic
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's course correction on national TV was not the mea culpa that his critics expected, but rather an exercise in blame-sharing. Government and ruling party spin doctors were quick to blame the social media for misleading the public regarding the government's intentions and actions.
A LEADER WITH A HEART
As the Chief Justice of India-designate readies to take over the country’s top judicial position, the system prepares for a balanced, humane approach to issues
A SURGICAL STRIKE
The government’s new guidelines for ethics and digital media are related to recent events but it has been in the works for some time. The legal implications are worth examining
STRIKING A BALANCE
The Maharashtra imbroglio has shown the need to keep a balance between institutions. It is best to apply the first principles of criminal law here-police investigate, judges decide
DIFFERING LEGAL PERSPECTIVES
A debate has started whether the impeachment is a legal, political or political-legal trial. Will it be unconstitutional to impeach a POTUS who has left office? Will it ultimately have to be decided by SCOTUS?
The Court came to the rescue of the nation by intervening with a statesman-like approach when the centre was faltering in its administrative capacity, leading to much-needed course correction
THUNDER IN THE COURTS
THAT the courts and the judiciary have had to step in to virtually dictating how to address the corona holocaust that is cutting a swath of death and destruction across the country is an ample demonstration of malfeasance, misfeasance and the collapse of governance throughout the nation.
WRITTEN LIKE A TRUE JUDGE
HERE'S some really nourishing food for healthy and robust thought: A democratically elected government should be pleased when it faces dissent as this tells it what is going wrong with its administration and how to rectify wrongs. Handling it with an imperial heavy-handedness through the police is self-destructive and ultimately counterproductive.
“EVERY JOURNALIST ENTITLED TO PROTECTION AGAINST SEDITION”
In a landmark order, the Court quashed a sedition case against Vinod Dua by invoking the 1962 Kedar Nath case. It said a citizen has the right to criticise the government as long as he does not incite people to violence