Last year was humbling for the Federal Reserve. In 2019 policymakers were forced to unwind a series of interest-rate hikes they had implemented the year before, citing strains on the U.S. economy from President Trump’s trade wars and a global slowdown. In the process, the central bank appeared to be sacrificing its autonomy by caving into Trump’s relentless demands for cheap money. There was still another reason for the Fed’s reversal, one that goes to the heart of the institution’s dual mandate of ensuring full employment and stable prices. It had underestimated how many jobless Americans were still out there—not technically counted as unemployed but willing to work.
By the time the jobless rate dipped below 4% in the spring of 2018—for only the second time in a half-century—central bankers thought they had accomplished their goal of maximum employment. Their next challenge was to ensure the tight labor market didn’t trigger a so-called wage-price spiral. They began charting a course to raise interest rates high enough to discourage hiring. Yet, unexpectedly, inflation didn’t bubble up, even as unemployment continued to drift lower. It’s 3.5% now.
Fed officials are currently engaged in some deep introspection about what they got wrong. At the center of those discussions is the notion of full employment. Zero joblessness is almost an impossible goal, since even in a dynamic, well- functioning labor market there will always be some people who are temporarily unemployed as they move between jobs. What monetary authorities fixate on instead is the sweet spot at which unemployment is low but not low enough to spark inflation. Yet this level can only be extrapolated from past experience. Testifying before Congress in February 2018, just weeks after becoming Fed chair, Jerome Powell acknowledged the inherent lack of precision, saying: “If I had to make an estimate, I’d say it’s somewhere in the low 4s, but what that really means is it could be 5 and it could be 3.5.”
Continue reading your story on the app
Continue reading your story in the magazine
The Greatly Exaggerated Death of (Some) Cities
Anticipating the end of the pandemic, U.S. homebuyers are looking to denser neighborhoods in smaller urban areas
Online Booze Gets a Covid Boost
Liquor e-commerce never took offin the U.S. Then pandemic lockdowns came along
The Global King of Supply-Chain Debt
Greeensill Capital arranges loans that speed up business payments. That’s riskier than it sounds
TIM COOK'S $2.3 TRILLION FORTRESS
Trade war? Pfft. Trump? Please. Antitrust? Zuck’s problem. (Ditto privacy.) Revenue? Endless
Stumbling Back to Class
Biden wants to reopen schools fast. Teacher pushback and new virus strains mean progress will be bumpy
The Space Between Us
Pandemic life has spelled out the limits—and a few joys—of spending time together.
JOEY TALLMADGE, SHIRLEY SMITH, AND THEIR FORMER CO-WORKERS ARE BATTLING PRIVATE EQUITY FOR THE SEVERANCE AND HEALTH COVERAGE THEY LOST IN BANKRUPTCY. OTHER LAID-OFF AMERICANS MIGHT DO THE SAME
What Robinhood and Apple Have in Common
There’s a curious thread connecting Robinhood, Facebook, Twitter, and Apple this year: The technology companies are starting to take active responsibility for what happens on their platforms.
When the Signal Goes Out
Government-ordered internet shutdowns are becoming more frequent
For Biden, Only the Left Is Left
Instead of wooing the centrist rump of the GOP, the president turns the other way