Does the IWKA Wing Chun have a clear lineage? Many people like to speculate about our approach as we have no single lineage, but instead, we source from many ancient and different Wing Chun lineages following my Sifu’s research. So, to me, we are a more authentic lineage. However, I would like to explain myself better about the previous statement, considering that words “Authentic”, “Traditional” and “Original” are laughable at best when it comes to Wing Chun and Kung Fu in general.
If we believe in following a lineage in a very servile and dogmatic way, then for sure the IWKA (Internal Wisdom and Knowledge Association) has no clear lineage. However, if we instead approach it as studying the art as a whole, with all the different interpretations that were born during the past history, and the obvious evolution to adapt it through passing time, to keep it effective, then I would consider the IWKA to be the most complete Internal Wing Chun system. Especially considering the clear and logical system of teaching that has been developed during these past years.
To sum up, I’m not implying that the IWKA is a better school when compared to others, but the research done by Sifu Sergio has filled those gaps and misunderstandings that are still very alive in many traditional approaches nowadays.
The IWKA seems to incorporate quite a bit of Tang Yick’s Weng Chun. Could you elaborate on its methods for us?
この記事は Wing Chun Illustrated の Issue No. 44, 2018 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、8,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です ? サインイン
この記事は Wing Chun Illustrated の Issue No. 44, 2018 版に掲載されています。
7 日間の Magzter GOLD 無料トライアルを開始して、何千もの厳選されたプレミアム ストーリー、8,500 以上の雑誌や新聞にアクセスしてください。
すでに購読者です? サインイン