The Indian Air Force was forced to sit out the 1962 war by the nation’s political leadership for reasons that can most charitably be described as non-military. Had the IAF participated in the war, as it was well-trained and equipped to do, the outcome would have been different. But that is history. If war is imposed on the country today, the IAF is sure to make its presence felt. AIR MARSHAL PK BARBORA (RETD), former Vice Chief of Air Staff, in discussion with VIJAINDER K THAKUR on how 2017 is different from 1962
In the context of the ongoing Doka La face off between Indian and Chinese troops, China’s official and state sponsored media - People's Daily, Xinhua, and Global Times is sending India a clear and unequivocal message - Remember your defeat in 1962 and accept China's position in the Doka La stand-off at the Sikkim border.
China’s state sponsored media often lacks objectivity and grace; sometimes it’s rabid and is used by the Communist Party of China (CPC) to deliver crude threats to other nations. The verbiage emanating from the media cannot be taken literally, but in a convoluted manner it often reflects CPC thinking.
India can interpret the implied threat as crude psychological warfare, or pause and ponder. The problem is, pause and ponder is what India has done so far in the face of China's salami slicing of India’s territorial integrity. This time China wants a meatier chunk and India finds itself cornered. Pause and ponder is the one option that India doesn’t have.
The 1962 reminder is clearly designed to rattle India and weaken its resolve to stand firm against the PLAA at Doka La. Admittedly, the reminder is based on historical facts. However, historical war fighting results cannot be extrapolated 55 years into the future, especially when given the dynamics of an interconnected world with rapid technological advances. The outcome of the 1962 war was determined by military ground realities that existed then. The outcome of any military conflagration in 2017 would be decided by ground realities that exist today.
In general, the military ground realities that existed then and now are as follows.
• Technologically, India and China were at par in 1962 and they remain at par today.
This story is from the August 2017 edition of Geopolitics.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the August 2017 edition of Geopolitics.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
Does Technology Alone Win Wars And Lead To Victory?
RAJ MEHTA answers that despite the critical role of technology in fighting a war, human beings remain the most effective systems for determining its course. For, the conduct of war requires both science and art - leadership, quality soldiers, cohesive units/streamlined organisation
FOREIGN POLICY FROM BELOW
When I was a university student, the prevailing thought of the time was that “public opinion” should not matter in the conduct of a country’s foreign policy. It was argued that the public was grossly unaware of the nuances of foreign policy decision-making, which was the domain of elite opinion leaders and diplomats. The public opinion-foreign policy linkage, particularly in India, was considered to be “indirect at best” because foreign policy was a low-salience issue for the Indian public.
RENEWED CIVIL WAR IN MYANMAR
With the junta losing its grip on power and rebels making gains, both India and China have to rework their strategies towards Naypyidaw, writes SIMRAN SODHI
THE PATH TOWARDS ENHANCED MOBILITY
While the Indian Army has a significantly large fleet of lorries and utility vehicles, there is a need to further augment the capabilities by adding the latest platforms with better fuel efficiency, faster speeds, and enhanced load-bearing capacities. A special report by AMARTYA SINHA
BOOSTING ANTI-ARMOUR FIREPOWER
India’s evolving anti-tank guided-missile capabilities have undergone a paradigm shift in recent years. A Special Report
RED SEA ATTACKS: SHOULD INDIAN NAVY JOIN US-LED NAVAL COALITION?
India's rise as a global power and the growing expectations from its partners that it should play an active role in the Indo-Pacific appears to be on a test in the Red Sea, adversely affected by the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. PRAKASH NANDA examines the pros and cons.
BYTES TO BULLETS: INDIA'S MOUNTING CYBER CHALLENGES
In a connected world, digital footprints are everywhere. This is where future wars are likely to be fought. ANTARA JHA examines the developments and the impact that cyber threats pose to the nation.
FIGHTING AGAINST VIRTUAL ENEMIES
The Indian government is in the process of executing some radical reforms which will completely transform the way wars are fought against unfriendly forces in the dimension of cyberspace, explains AMARTYA SINHA
FIGHTING CYBER ATTACKS
VAISHALI BASU SHARMA explains how India is fortifying the Digital Ecosystem Through the Digital Personal Data Protection Act
'A TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED BLUE WATER FORCE'
ADMIRAL R HARI KUMAR assumed command of the Indian Navy on 30 November 2021 as the 25th Chief of the Naval Staff. In over two years at the helm, Admiral Harti Kumar has driven the modernisation of the Indian Navy and prepared it to meet the challenges that the country faces in the Indian Ocean Region. Exclusive excerpts from a recent Q&A.