Switch to previous version of Magzter
Observations
Observations

Afield with Nosler AccuBonds

Lee J. Hoots

While perusing hand loading supplies last August in a local store catering specifically to hunters and anglers, I overheard a curious conversation between two fellows, one of whom was shopping for 180- grain bullets for an apparently new rifle. The man had settled on two potential options, and his buddy offered the following advice: “Buy the ones with the plastic tips. They’ll be more accurate, shoot flatter, and you’ll be able to shoot farther.”

When the gentlemen left to pay for their goods, I peeked at what they had been looking at. One box contained sleek, plastic-tipped bullets while the other held pointed, boat-tail soft points. The ballistic coefficient (BC) for each 180-grain bullet was looked up that afternoon, whereupon I found what was already figured to be true. The lead tipped bullet had a BC of .452 while the plastic-tipped bullet had a BC of .480. The difference of .028 BC is nearly impossible to recognize downrange in most hunting situations, and either bullet placed in the heart or lungs of a deer or elk will do its chore.

While not intending to get into the complexities of various bullet designs – which would take up more space than is allowed here and has been suitably cleared up in Rifle and Hand loader magazines – I think it sufficient to note that not everything said or written about modern, plastic-tipped bullets can be taken as irrefutable fact. For example, the plastic tip alone does not make such bullets more accurate; the plastic tip by itself does not dramatically change BC in all bullet designs; and the good expansion or penetration seen with such bullets is not due specifically to the use of the tip.

Continue Reading with Magzter GOLD

GoldLogo

Get unlimited access to thousands of curated premium stories and 5,000+ magazines

READ THE ENTIRE ISSUE

November - December 2017