Have a good look”, the magician says: “Can you confirm that this is a perfectly ordinary hat?” For you, this is no fun at all. You awkwardly turn it over a few times and self-consciously agree that it seems fine. Something is bound to be amiss – but what? You have no idea what sort of abnormality to guard against. In this setting, it is unclear what counts as an ‘ordinary’ hat, so you might object that it is senseless to confirm that it is one. ‘Ordinary’ has its meaning fixed by relevant contrasts; there is no single property which the word denotes in all settings.
Back in 1962, in Sense and Sensibilia, J. L. Austin complained that philosophers often put us in a similar predicament. They might draw our attention to a table and ask: Is this real, or is it an illusion, a ‘flicker on the cave wall’? Or they might get more personal, asking whether your life is authentic: Is this the real you?
As with the magician, these questions can leave us baffled and perhaps a little embarrassed. According to Austin, this is because the philosopher’s questions about reality are analogous to the magician’s question: like ‘ordinary’, ‘real’ only makes sense if the context makes it clear what counts as unreality. Unfortunately, the philosopher frequently withholds this context, giving the false impression that ‘real’ denotes an important property which both tables and (say) people might lack. This trick creates the bogus sense that something urgent is at issue.
Unreal Demands
هذه القصة مأخوذة من طبعة August/September 2023 من Philosophy Now.
ابدأ النسخة التجريبية المجانية من Magzter GOLD لمدة 7 أيام للوصول إلى آلاف القصص المتميزة المنسقة وأكثر من 8500 مجلة وصحيفة.
بالفعل مشترك ? تسجيل الدخول
هذه القصة مأخوذة من طبعة August/September 2023 من Philosophy Now.
ابدأ النسخة التجريبية المجانية من Magzter GOLD لمدة 7 أيام للوصول إلى آلاف القصص المتميزة المنسقة وأكثر من 8500 مجلة وصحيفة.
بالفعل مشترك? تسجيل الدخول
Who's Watching Who?
Grant Bartley tells a terrifying tale of privacy, paranoia and popular culture.
M.M. Bakhtin (1895-1975)
Vladimir Makovtsev asks: M.M. Bakhtin, philosopher or philologist?
Kant & Love
Ivan lyer has a beautiful Kantian understanding of love.
Kant the (P)Russian Philosopher?
Robert R. Clewis considers present implications of Kant’s Russian connections.
What You Need to Read Before You Read Kant
22nd April 2024 is the 300th birthday of Immanuel Kant.
The Healing of Philosophy
John Clark, MD, says our worship of the intellect has become pathological.
When to Hold Your Friends' Feet to the Fire
Jordan Myers argues, against Christine Korsgaard, that we shouldn't always hold our friends morally responsible.
How to Be an Antiracist Consequentialist
Nathaniel Goldberg and Chris Gavaler consider lbram X. Kendi’s requirements for being antiracist.
Shakespeare: Folly, Humanism & Critical Theory
Sam Gilchrist Hall! surveys folly and wisdom in Shakespeare's world and beyond.
Don Quixote & Narrative Identity
Inés Pereira Rodrigues asks, are we always or ever) who we Say we are?