THE FUSS is over a pill-an abortion pill that has been used safely for nearly a quarter-century, but has now become a political, medical, legal and regulatory hot potato. It's an intense legal battle with profound ramifications. Not only is it leading to more vociferous protests and campaigns in a society deeply divided on the matter, but it is undermining the very basis of regulation by an independent federal agency in the US.
The case that is roiling the US is a suit by a group of doctors who are seeking to curtail the availability of the nation's most used abortion drug, mifepristone. Approved in 2000 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), its usage has increased steadily over the decades after it has proven to be safe and effective. According to the Guttmacher Institute, a non-governmental organisation that promotes reproductive rights worldwide, there were approximately 642,700 medication abortions in the US last year, accounting for 63 per cent of all abortions in the formal healthcare system. The numbers would be higher since the institute did not take into account the usage outside the formal system. In combination with misoprostol, the two-drug regimen is the most widely prescribed abortion therapy. As such, millions of women are anxious about the outcome of the doctors' lawsuit, as is FDA, since a hard right judiciary has passed orders that undercut its role in approving drugs and setting the rules for their usage.
The anti-abortion doctors and organisations in this suit claim participating in the care of women who have resorted to the use of the abortion pill "to end the life of the embryo or foetus would cause them emotional and moral harm". And how would this occur? They say there would be moral harm because patients who take abortion pills might seek treatment afterwards at emergency departments in hospitals where the doctors work.
This story is from the April 16, 2024 edition of Down To Earth.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber ? Sign In
This story is from the April 16, 2024 edition of Down To Earth.
Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.
Already a subscriber? Sign In
INVISIBLE THREAT
Significant presence of microplastics in Puducherry’s agricultural soil raises concerns for soil and crop health
Feeding off each other
VEGETARIAN MOVEMENTS IN SOUTH ASIA AND THE WEST GREW WITH MUTUAL SUPPORT AND VALIDATION
India's unhealthy patent amendments
Despite strong pleas, the Modi regime has changed the rules to impose a cost on those who challenge faulty patents
URBAN DISCOMFORT
Poorly planned, heat-trapping infrastructure, along with dwindling natural spaces, turn up the temperatures in major Indian cities
BLAZING SUN IS ON
Rising temperatures are testing the limits of human tolerance to heat. With their predominantly built-up landscape, urban areas offer no respite. A study by the Centre for Science and Environment on the morphology and heat patterns of nine Indian cities over the past decade shows how these urban centres are turning into heat islands with a potentially serious impact on human health. An analysis by Rajneesh Sareen, Mitashi Singh and Nimish Gupta, with Shagun in Haryana and Kiran Pandey
"H5N1 may be more severe than COVID-19"
In early April, the US confirmed the first case of avian influenza in livestock, along with cow-to-human transmission of the virus disease.
A PSYCHEDELIC HIGH
Driven by surge in global trials and low success rate of current medications in treating mental health problems, researchers call for home-grown clinical trials of psychedelic drugs
Locked out
Two years after becoming the only state to be excluded from the Centre's ruralemployment guarantee scheme, villages in West Bengal grapple with distress migration and debt traps
'Protection from climate change part of right to life'
The Supreme Court of India, on April 5, recognised that citizens have a right to be free from the adverse effects of climate change, saying it is intertwined with the fundamental rights to life and equality. Here are the key arguments articulated by the three-judge bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra in their judgement
Weaving dreams
Tribal communities in West Bengal slowly embrace traditional weaving to ensure sustainable livelihood