THE BATTLE FOR ATTENTION
The New Yorker|May 06, 2024
How do we hold on to what matters in a distracted age?
NATHAN HELLER
THE BATTLE FOR ATTENTION

Οn a subway train not long ago, I had the familiar, unsettling experience of standing behind a fellow passenger and watching everything that she was doing on her phone. It was a crowded car, rush hour, with the dim but unwarm lighting of the oldest New York City trains. The stranger's phone was bright, and as I looked on she scrolled through a waterfall of videos that other people had filmed in their homes. She watched one for four or five seconds, then dispatched it by twitching her thumb. She flicked to a text message, did nothing with it, and flipped back. The figures on her screen, dressed carefully and mugging at the camera like mimes, seemed desperate for something that she could not provide: her sustained attention. I felt mortified, not least because I saw on both sides of the screen symptoms I recognized too clearly in myself.

For years, we have heard a litany of reasons why our capacity to pay attention is disturbingly on the wane. Technology the buzzing, blinking pageant on our screens and in our pockets— hounds us. Modern life, forever quicker and more scattered, drives concentration For just as long, concerns of this variety could be put aside. Television was described as a force against attention even in the nineteen-forties. A lot of focussed, worthwhile work has taken place since then.

This story is from the May 06, 2024 edition of The New Yorker.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.

This story is from the May 06, 2024 edition of The New Yorker.

Start your 7-day Magzter GOLD free trial to access thousands of curated premium stories, and 8,500+ magazines and newspapers.

MORE STORIES FROM THE NEW YORKERView All
INSIDE JOB-"Hit Man"
The New Yorker

INSIDE JOB-"Hit Man"

Years before Hannah Arendt coined, in the pages of this magazine, the phrase \"the banality of evil,\" popular films and fiction were embodying that idea in the character of the hit man. In classic crime movies such as \"This Gun for Hire\" (1942) and \"Murder by Contract\" (1958), hit men figure much as Nazis do in political movies, as symbols of abstract evil.

time-read
6 mins  |
June 10, 2024
WHATEVER YOU SAY
The New Yorker

WHATEVER YOU SAY

Rereading Jenny Holzer, at the Guggenheim.

time-read
6 mins  |
June 10, 2024
SUBCONSCIOUSLY YOURS
The New Yorker

SUBCONSCIOUSLY YOURS

Does every generation get the Freud it deserves?

time-read
9 mins  |
June 10, 2024
BY A WHISKER
The New Yorker

BY A WHISKER

Louis Wain and the reinvention of the cat.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June 10, 2024
Beyond Imagining
The New Yorker

Beyond Imagining

Bessie, Lotte, Ruth, Farah, and Bridget, who had been lunching together for half a century, joined in later years by Ilka, Hope, and, occasionally, Lucinella, had agreed without the need for discussion that they were not going to pass, pass away, and under no circumstances on.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June 10, 2024
STATES OF PLAY
The New Yorker

STATES OF PLAY

Can advocates use state supreme courts to preserve-and perhaps expand-constitutional rights?

time-read
10+ mins  |
June 10, 2024
THE LONG RIDE
The New Yorker

THE LONG RIDE

The surf legend Jock Sutherland's unlikely life.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June 10, 2024
ARE WE DOOMED?
The New Yorker

ARE WE DOOMED?

A course at the University of Chicago thinks it through.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June 10, 2024
GOD EXPLAINS THE RULES OF HIS NEW BOARD GAME
The New Yorker

GOD EXPLAINS THE RULES OF HIS NEW BOARD GAME

Guys, want to play this new board game? It’s called Life. No, it’s not “one of God’s impossible-to-understand games that take three hours to learn.” It’ll be fun, I promise!

time-read
3 mins  |
June 10, 2024
RED LINE
The New Yorker

RED LINE

With the election approaching, the U.S. and Mexico wrangle over border policy.

time-read
10+ mins  |
June 10, 2024